EUROSPINE 2026 — Spine in Motion Gothenburg, 7–9 October 2026

Cervical & Neural Pathologies

The Cord-to-Canal Ratio as a Radiographic Tool in Congenital Cervical Spinal Stenosis

A. Gillespie1, J. Silvestre1, R. Ferdon1, C. Reitman1, R. Ravinsky1

  1. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America
Poster 000912: The Cord-to-Canal Ratio as a Radiographic Tool in Congenital Cervical Spinal Stenosis
Abstract no.
000912
Topic
Cervical & Neural Pathologies
Author
A. Gillespie
Open full e-poster

Opens at full size in a new tab — zoom in to read the detail.

Abstract PDF

Abstract

Congenital cervical spinal stenosis (CCS), characterized by reduced sagittal canal diameter, is a risk factor for early-onset degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Traditional assessment using the Torg-Pavlov ratio (TPR) focuses solely on osseous anatomy. MRI enables visualization of both bony and soft tissue structures, allowing for advanced metrics like the Cord-to-Canal Ratio (CCR) and Spinal Cord Occupation Ratio (SCOR). However, no consensus exists on which MRI-based metric best correlates with symptomatic CCS. This study compares CCR, MRI TPR, and SCOR to assess their interrelationships and diagnostic performance.

97 patients undergoing cervical spine MRI at a tertiary care center from January-December 2024 were included. Measurements at the C5 mid-vertebral level were used to calculate CCR (cord/sac diameter), MRI TPR (dural sac/vertebral body diameter), and SCOR (cord/sac area). Patient charts were reviewed for myelopathic signs/symptoms. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated via ROC analysis. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed metric interrelationships; TPR values were inverted for uniformity in severity interpretation.

56% (n = 54) of patients had myelopathic symptoms. CCR had the highest sensitivity (80%) but lowest specificity (44%). SCOR had the highest AUC (0.75), followed by TPR (0.69) and CCR (0.63). CCR correlated moderately with TPR (r = –0.52); SCOR showed weak correlation with inverted TPR (r = 0.20; p < 0.0001). No correlation differences were observed between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups.

CCR demonstrates clinical relevance and correlates with established metrics, supporting its use in CCS risk stratification and surgical planning.