EUROSPINE 2026 — Spine in Motion Gothenburg, 7–9 October 2026

Degenerative Thoracolumbar

Ambulatory endoscopic lumbar decompression in geriatric patients: a prospective feasibility and outcomes study

S. RODRIGUES1, A. Boishardy2, B. Benjamin1

  1. Hospital Pellegrin Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
  2. Hospital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
Poster 001012: Ambulatory endoscopic lumbar decompression in geriatric patients: a prospective feasibility and outcomes study
Abstract no.
001012
Topic
Degenerative Thoracolumbar
Author
S. RODRIGUES
Open full e-poster

Opens at full size in a new tab — zoom in to read the detail.

Abstract PDF

Abstract

Outpatient spine surgery is expanding, yet its feasibility and safety in geriatric patients remain insufficiently documented. Endoscopic lumbar decompression may facilitate ambulatory management through tissue-sparing approaches and faster recovery. This prospective study evaluated the feasibility, clinical effectiveness, and safety of outpatient endoscopic lumbar decompression in patients aged ≥75 years.

A prospective non-interventional study included consecutive patients aged ≥75 years undergoing planned outpatient endoscopic lumbar decompression for degenerative lumbar stenosis. Outpatient success was defined as absence of inpatient admission within 30 days. Sociodemographic, comorbidity, surgical, and patient-reported outcomes (lumbar and radicular VAS, ODI, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS, SF-36, walking distance, IADL) were collected preoperatively and at 3 months. Non-parametric tests were used with significance set at p < 0.05.

Thirty-four patients were analyzed (mean age 80 ± 4 years; 59% female). Outpatient management was successful in 73% (25/34). Nine patients (27%) required hospitalization, mainly on the day of surgery due to insufficient recovery in the post-anesthesia care unit or logistical reasons. Chronic kidney disease was more frequent in the failure group (33.3% vs 4.0%; p = 0.04), whereas BMI was higher in the success group (28.0 ± 4.0 vs 25.3 ± 2.4 kg/m²; p = 0.02).

Significant improvements were observed at 3 months across all major outcomes: lumbar VAS −2.0 points (p < 0.05), radicular VAS −5.2 (p < 0.05), ODI −21.5 (p < 0.05), EQ-5D-5L index +0.30 (p < 0.05), EQ-VAS +17.6 (p < 0.05), SF-36 PCS +2.9 and MCS +6.5 (both p < 0.05), and walking distance +300 m (p < 0.05). No surgical-site infections, no conversions to open surgery, and no reoperations occurred during follow-up.

Outpatient endoscopic lumbar decompression is feasible in selected patients aged ≥75 years, with meaningful improvements in pain, function, and quality of life and a favorable safety profile. Advanced age alone should not be considered a contraindication to outpatient spine surgery. Most failures were related to early postoperative recovery or logistics, suggesting that optimization of perioperative pathways may further increase ambulatory success in this growing population.