EUROSPINE 2026 — Spine in Motion Gothenburg, 7–9 October 2026

Basic Science & Economics

Zero radiation surgery: A pilot study of MRI- based navigation in spine surgery

J. Hallsten1, J. Hutchins1, K. Lagerstrand2, H. Hebelka3, H. Brisby4

  1. Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
  2. Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
  3. Drottning S, Gothenburg, Sweden
  4. Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, Sweden
Poster 000400: Zero radiation surgery: A pilot study of MRI- based navigation in spine surgery
Abstract no.
000400
Topic
Basic Science & Economics
Session
Science Chat - Degenerative Thoracolumbar
Author
J. Hallsten
Open full e-poster

Opens at full size in a new tab — zoom in to read the detail.

Abstract PDF

Abstract

Computer-assisted navigation to improve the accuracy of hardware placement during surgery usually rely on pre- or intraoperative computed tomography (CT). Radiation exposure from CT may contribute to iatrogenic malignancy. Technological advancements have enabled creation of synthetic CT-like images (sCT) from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. The aim of this clinical study was to compare the use of sCT with standard CT for lumbar pedicle screw placement using surgical surface matched navigation and further to assess our first three patients with fully sCT navigated screws.

Preoperatively 5 lumbar fusion surgery patients were enrolled. Standard CT and custom MRI images (converted to sCT images using a commercial product) were obtained. Dual navigation, displaying the CT on one system and the sCT on the other, both calibrated via surface matching during the surgical procedure (Fig. 1). Navigation was performed using the CT, while synthetic CT served as a reference (“shadow”) system. Simultaneous screenshots captured navigated screw placements in the most proximal vertebra for each patient. Measurements of screw-to-bone cortex and bone-to-bone cortical distances were assessed:  on axial views, screw tip-apex distance (ST/A AX), screw-to-medial-cortex distance (Medial AX) and vertebral with/length on sagittal views, screw tip-apex distance (ST/A SAG), screw-to-proximal-foraminal-edge distance (Proximal SAG) and vertebral height/length (Fig. 2).  Mean ± SD were calculated and a paired comparison between CT and sCT was performed.  After the CT/sCT comparison cohort, three patients were navigated using sCT (MRI) alone, and their screw placements were evaluated.

None of the screws using CT navigation crossed any cortical boundary when assessed on sCT views. The comparison between CT and sCT screw positions measurements showed mean (SD) differences of 0.2 (2.2) mm for ST/A AX, 0.4 (2.0) mm for ST/A SAG, 0.3 (1.0) mm for Medial AX, and 0.2 (0.9) mm for Proximal SAG. For vertebral measurements, the mean (SD) differences for AX width were 0.6 (2.9) mm, AX length 1.9 (1.0) mm, SAG height 0.8 (1.8) mm, and SAG length 1.8 (0.7) mm. In hardware-to-bone measurements and bone-to-bone (vertebral) measurements, 22/40 distances respectively 13/20 distances were longer on CT. All screws in the 3 sCT (MRI) navigated patients were confirmed placed correctly.

There were minimal and no systematic differences between the CT and sCT images in hardware-to-bone or vertebral measurements when using a surface-matched navigation system for lumbar pedicle screw placement. The sCT (MRI) images appeared to perform  comparable to standard CT for surface-matched lumbar screw placement and the first three MRI/sCT navigated patients were performed without complications. This encourages further work with radiation-free navigation to limit radiation exposure for the patients.

Figures and tables

Fig 1) The dual navigation setup in the operation room. One system had the preoperative CT loaded, the other the sCT loaded as a shadow system.
Fig 1) The dual navigation setup in the operation room. One system had the preoperative CT loaded, the other the sCT loaded as a shadow system.
Fig 1) The dual navigation setup in the operation room. One system had the preoperative CT loaded, the other the sCT loaded as a shadow system. Fig 2) The two i
Fig 1) The dual navigation setup in the operation room. One system had the preoperative CT loaded, the other the sCT loaded as a shadow system. Fig 2) The two images on the left show the screws placed on the surface matched CT. The images on the right are taken at the same time from the shadow system.

As submitted with the abstract. Tap a figure to open it at full size.