EUROSPINE 2026 — Spine in Motion Gothenburg, 7–9 October 2026

Trauma

The Impact of Surgical Timing on Neurological Recovery in Traumatic Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta- analysis

M. Loiola Magalhães Alves1, J. Do Vale Moura Costa2, S.N.F. Julia3, L. Marielle Almeida Santana1, G. Azevedo Garrido2, C. Soares4, J. Victor Pereira Gonzalez2, E. Santos Brazão5, A. Olimpío Da Silva Moura Costa5

  1. Zarns University, Salvador, Brazil
  2. EBMSP, Salvador, Brazil
  3. UNISA, São , Brazil
  4. Uni Atenas, passos, Brazil
  5. Hospital são rafael, Salvador, Brazil
Poster 000143: The Impact of Surgical Timing on Neurological Recovery in Traumatic Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta- analysis
Abstract no.
000143
Topic
Trauma
Author
M. Loiola Magalhães Alves
Open full e-poster

Opens at full size in a new tab — zoom in to read the detail.

Abstract PDF

Abstract

The timing of surgical decompression is an important prognostic factor in traumatic spinal cord injury(tSCI), yet evidence supporting early surgery is derived mainly from cervical injuries, leaving thoracic and thoracolumbar data limited and heterogeneous. This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed the impact of early versus delayed decompression on neurological recovery after traumatic thoracic or thoracolumbar spinal cord injury.

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to November 2025. RCTs and analytical observational studies were included if they enrolled patients ≥16 years with acute thoracic/thoracolumbar tSCI (T1–L2), compared decompression ≤24 h or ≤8 h versus >24 h or >8 h, and reported neurological recovery using ASIA and/or Frankel. Primary outcomes were ASIA grade improvement ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3. Pooled ORs (95% CI) were calculated using a random-effects Mantel–Haenszel model; heterogeneity was assessed using I² and Cochran’s Q. Analyses were performed in RevMan 5.4. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (non-randomized studies).

Twelve studies encompassing 1,412 patients were included. Early decompression (≤24 hours) was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of neurological improvement compared with delayed decompression (>24 hours). The pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant effect favoring early surgery for improvement of at least one ASIA grade (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.32–2.08, I² = 6%, p < 0.0001), at least two ASIA grades (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.35–5.19, I² = 45%, p = 0.005), and three or more ASIA grades (OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.59–9.98, I² = 0%, p = 0.003). Ultra-early decompression (≤8 hours) was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of neurological improvement of at least one ASIA grade compared with later decompression (>8 hours) (OR 5.26, 95% CI 2.28–12.16, I² = 10%, p = 0.0001). For improvement of at least two ASIA grades, ultra-early decompression was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of neurological improvement compared with later decompression (>8 hours) (OR 17.06, 95% CI 4.17–69.72, I² = 0%, p < 0.0001). For improvement of three or more ASIA grades, ultra-early decompression also did not show a statistically significant association (OR 5.40, 95% CI 0.88–32.94, I² = 0%, p = 0.07).

Early surgical decompression within 24 hours was associated with significantly improved neurological recovery in traumatic thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal cord injury. Ultra-early decompression within 8 hours showed a strong effect size for neurological improvement, but evidence for more marked recovery, such as improvement of three or more ASIA grades, remains limited by small sample sizes and wide confidence intervals.