EUROSPINE 2026 — Spine in Motion Gothenburg, 7–9 October 2026

Growing Spine

Accuracy of IS-GROWTH predictions of the risk of reaching the clinically significant thresholds of 30°, 45° and 50° in idiopathic scoliosis patients

S. Negrini1, T. Bassani2, C. Pulici3, F. Negrini4, F. Zaina3, A. Negrini3

  1. Università degli studi di Milano, milano, Italy
  2. IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
  3. ISICO, Milan, Italy
  4. University of Insubria, Varese, Italy, milano, Italy
Poster 000377: Accuracy of IS-GROWTH predictions of the risk of reaching the clinically significant thresholds of 30°, 45° and 50° in idiopathic scoliosis patients
Abstract no.
000377
Topic
Growing Spine
Author
F. Zaina
Open full e-poster

Opens at full size in a new tab — zoom in to read the detail.

Abstract PDF

Abstract

IS-GROWTH has recently been developed to predict the progression of Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS) at allages, with curves up to 70° at start. While it provides a graphical representation of the wide range ofpossible evolutions, IS-GROWTH does not offer risk thresholds, unlike the previously developed BrAISTCalc(applicable only to adolescents IS curves 20-40°, Risser 0-2). The objective is to develop IS-GROWTH predictive formulae for the risk of reaching significant clinical thresholds at theend of growth: 30° for probable stability in adulthood; 45° and 50° for surgical indications

We considered the two groups (development and temporal validation) from the previously published ISGROWTHpaper, which included all available IS children who presented to our institute with prior X-raystaken before any treatment. We examined the distribution within the individually predicted ranges in thevalidation group. We applied a mathematical transformation to approximate a normal distribution andassessed normality using the Asymmetry and Kurtosis tests. We developed prediction models for the 30°, 45°, and 50° thresholds. We performed temporalvalidation on all radiograph pairs. We assessed performance using the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for discrimination, the accuracy of risk estimates through Brier Scores (BS) with 95% Confidence Intervals (95CI), and calibration analysis using risk deciles to compare predictedprobabilities with observed outcomes.

We evaluated the distribution of IS-GROWTH predictions for 552 patients (74% female, 12.4±2.0 and14.7±1.7 years, 19±9° and 26±11° at start and end, respectively). A square-root transformation providedthe best approximation to a normal distribution (asymmetry 0.01, kurtosis 0.72). To temporally validatethe prediction model, we had 270 pairs of radiographs (187 patients; 87% female; first radiograph belowage 10 for 17, and above age 10 at Risser 0, 1, 2, and 3 for 80, 31, 56, and 86, respectively). At the end ofgrowth, we had 109 radiographs <30°, and 53 and 37 >45° and 50°, respectively. The AUC (95CI) were0.91 (0.87-0.95), 0.86 (0.80-0.93) and 0.81 (0.72-0.90) for the 30°, 45° and 50° thresholds, respectively.Overall predictive accuracy was high, with Brier Scores of 0.19 (0.15-0.22) for 30°, 0.15 (0.12-0.18) for45°, and 0.14 (0.11-0.17) for 50°. Calibration analysis showed a strong correlation between predicted andobserved risks across all thresholds, with high reliability even at the probability extremes for surgicalindications.

IS-GROWTH provides accurate, validated probabilities for reaching clinically significant thresholds. Complementing graphical trajectories with quantitative risk estimates offers a more comprehensive prognostic tool than existing models, applicable to a wider clinical population. These validated risk percentages allow for personalised counselling and shared decision-making.

Figures and tables

Figure 1 from the abstract

As submitted with the abstract. Tap a figure to open it at full size.